Analysis of Volcanic Ash Dispersion from The Mount Agung Eruption Using Himawari-8 Satellite Data: Case Studies from 25 November 2017; 28 June 2018, and 4 July 2018

Authors

  • Ire Pratiwi BMKG
  • Sulton Kharisma
  • Maria Carine P.D.V

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31172/jmg.v25i2.1143

Keywords:

Volcanic ash, TVAP, Split window, RGB, Dispersion

Abstract

The eruption of Mt. Agung in Bali province over the last two years caused Ngurah Rai International Airport in Bali province, Lombok International Airport in West Nusa Tenggara province, and Notohadinegoro Airport as well as Blimbingsari Airport, both in East Java province, close. The eruptions of volcanoes have a major impact on human activities as airplanes are the fastest and most efficient transportation. Volcanic ash can ruin the jet engine and lead to flameout. Accurate information on the movement and dispersion of volcanic ash was required, considering the location of Mt. Agung is far enough from the affected airports. One of the identifications of volcanic ash was processed using Himawari-8 satellite data with several channels. The satellite data was processed using TVAP (Three Band Volcanic Ash Product), Split Window, and RGB (Red Green Blue) techniques to get the result of the trajectory of volcanic ash dispersion. The result can be used as a reference in airport operations. It showed the movement and dispersion of volcanic ash from Mt. Agung’s eruption to the affected airport area, which resulted in the closure of the airports. The volcanic ash was dispersed in a west-southwest direction, impacting the central and southern regions of Bali Island.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I. Pratomo, “Klasifikasi gunung api aktif Indonesia, studi kasus dari beberapa letusan gunung api dalam sejarah,” Indones. J. Geosci., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 209–227, 2006, doi: 10.17014/ijog.vol1no4.20065.

B. D. R. Hinga, Ring of Fire: An Encyclopedia of the Pacific Rim’s Earthquakes, Tsunamis, and Volcanoes. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2015.

F. Romeo et al., “Volcanic Cloud Detection and Retrieval Using Satellite Multisensor Observations,” Remote Sens., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.3390/rs15040888.

H. L. Tanaka, H. Nakamichi, and M. Iguchi, “PUFF Model Prediction of Volcanic Ash Plume Dispersal for Sakurajima Using MP Radar Observation,” Atmosphere (Basel), vol. 11, no. 11, 2020, doi: 10.3390/atmos11111240.

Q. Liu et al., “Multi-Satellite Detection of Long-Range Transport and Transformation of Atmospheric Emissions from the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai Volcano,” Remote Sens., vol. 15, no. 10, 2023, doi: 10.3390/rs15102661.

A. De Laat, M. Vazquez-Navarro, N. Theys, and P. Stammes, “Analysis of Properties of the 19 February 2018 Volcanic Eruption of Mount Sinabung in S5P/TROPOMI and Himawari-8 Satellite Data,” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1203–1217, 2020, doi: 10.5194/nhess-20-1203-2020.

T. M. Kusky, “Déjà Vu: Might Future Eruptions of Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai Volcano Be a Repeat of the Devastating Eruption of Santorini, Greece (1650 BC)?,” J. Earth Sci., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 229–235, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12583-022-1624-2.

S. Kharisma, Suyatim, E. Wardoyo, and R. D. Ninggar, “Identification Characteristic Dispersion of Volcanic Ash Using PUFF Model with Weather Radar on Eruption of Mt. Rinjani August 2016,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 463–468, 2018, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.4219.

C. Saint, F. M. Beckett, F. Dioguardi, N. I. Kristiansen, and R. Tubbs, “Using Simulated Radiances to Understand the Limitations of Satellite-Retrieved Volcanic Ash Data and the Implications for Volcanic Ash Cloud Forecasting,” 2024, doi: 10.1029/2024JD041112.

K. McKee et al., “Evaluating the State-of-the-Art in Remote Volcanic Eruption Characterization Part II: Ulawun Volcano, Papua New Guinea,” J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., vol. 420, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107381.

T. Kaneko, K. Takasaki, F. Maeno, M. J. Wooster, and A. Yasuda, “Himawari-8 Infrared Observations of the June–August 2015 Mt Raung Eruption, Indonesia,” Earth Planets Space, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40623-018-0858-9.

G. P. Ellrod, B. H. Connell, and D. W. Hillger, “Improved Detection of Airborne Volcanic Ash Using Multispectral Infrared Satellite Data,” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., vol. 108, no. 12, 2003, doi: 10.1029/2002JD002802.

K. Bessho et al., “An Introduction to Himawari-8/9—Japan’s New-Generation Geostationary Meteorological Satellites,” J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 151–183, 2016, doi: 10.2151/jmsj.2016-009.

A. Capponi et al., “Refining an Ensemble of Volcanic Ash Forecasts Using Satellite Retrievals: Raikoke 2019,” Atmos. Chem. Phys., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 6115–6134, 2022, doi: 10.5194/acp-22-6115-2022.

T. Kaneko, A. Yasuda, Y. Yoshizaki, K. Takasaki, and Y. Honda, “Pseudo-Thermal Anomalies in the Shortwave Infrared Bands of the Himawari-8 AHI and Their Correction for Volcano Thermal Observation,” Earth Planets Space, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40623-018-0946-x.

C. Lucas, “Determining the Height of Deep Volcanic Eruptions over the Tropical Western Pacific with Himawari-8,” J. South. Hemisph. Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 102–115, 2023, doi: 10.1071/ES22033.

D. Piontek, L. Bugliaro, R. Müller, L. Muser, and M. Jerg, “Multi-Channel Spectral Band Adjustment Factors for Thermal Infrared Measurements of Geostationary Passive Imagers,” Remote Sens., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1–23, 2023, doi: 10.3390/rs15051247.

O. M. Pasaribu et al., “Pemanfaatan Citra Satelit Himawari-8 dan Model HYSPLIT untuk Identifikasi dan Simulasi Sebaran Debu Vulkanik Gunung Sinabung,” 2022, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31072.56327.

M. J. Pavolonis, W. F. Feltz, and A. K. Heidinger, “Improved Satellite-Based Volcanic Ash Detection and Height Estimates,” 86th AMS Annual Meeting, 2006.

M. Ryan and K. R. Pratama, “Identifikasi Trajektori Debu Vulkanik Letusan Gunung Gamalama dengan HYSPLIT dan Metode RGB pada Citra Satelit Himawari-8,” J. Meteorol. Klimatologi dan Geofis., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 29–35, 2017.

J. Bruckert et al., “Online Treatment of Eruption Dynamics Improves the Volcanic Ash and SO₂ Dispersion Forecast: Case of the 2019 Raikoke Eruption,” Atmos. Chem. Phys., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 3535–3552, 2022, doi: 10.5194/acp-22-3535-2022.

I. M. A. Satya and E. Febriati, “Kajian Perbandingan Model WRF-Chem dengan Penginderaan Jauh untuk Identifikasi Arah dan Distribusi Abu Vulkanik Gunung Merapi pada Kasus Erupsi 3 Maret 2020,” J. Manaj. Bencana, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 29–46, 2022, doi: 10.33172/jmb.v8i1.792.

K. Ishii, M. Hayashi, H. Ishimoto, and T. Shimbori, “Prediction of Volcanic Ash Concentrations in Ash Clouds from Explosive Eruptions Based on an Atmospheric Transport Model and the Japanese Meteorological Satellite Himawari-8: A Case Study for the Kirishima–Shinmoedake Eruption on April 4th, 2018,” Earth Planets Space, vol. 75, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40623-023-01790-y.

N. J. Harvey et al., “Quantifying the Impact of Meteorological Uncertainty on Emission Estimates and the Risk to Aviation Using Source Inversion for the Raikoke 2019 Eruption,” Atmos. Chem. Phys., vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 8529–8545, 2022, doi: 10.5194/acp-22-8529-2022.

K. Ishii, Y. Hayashi, and T. Shimbori, “Using Himawari-8, Estimation of SO₂ Cloud Altitude at Aso Volcano Eruption, on October 8, 2016,” Earth Planets Space, vol. 70, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40623-018-0793-9.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-24

How to Cite

Pratiwi, I., Kharisma, S., & Carine P.D.V, M. (2025). Analysis of Volcanic Ash Dispersion from The Mount Agung Eruption Using Himawari-8 Satellite Data: Case Studies from 25 November 2017; 28 June 2018, and 4 July 2018. Jurnal Meteorologi Dan Geofisika, 25(2), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.31172/jmg.v25i2.1143

Issue

Section

Article